Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones (2002) IMDB rating: 6.80 Plot: Ten years after the ‘Phantom Menace’ threatened the planet Naboo, Padme Amidala is now a Senator representing her homeworld. A faction of political separatists, led by Count Dooku, attempts to assassinate her. There aren’t enough Jedi to defend the Republic against the threat, so Chancellor Palpatine enlists the aid of Jango Fett, who promises that his army of clones will handle the situation. Meanwhile, Obi-Wan Kenobi continues to train the young Jedi Anakin Skywalker, who fears that the Jedi code will forbid his growing romance with Amidala…

Actors: Lee Christopher,Jackson Samuel L.,McGregor Ewan,McDiarmid Ian,Christensen Hayden,Oz Frank,Morrison Temuera,Logan Daniel,Smits Jimmy,Thompson Jack,Best Ahmed,Action,Adventure,Fantasy,Mystery,Romance,Sci-Fi,

What do you think about the order I'm about to watch my Star Wars marathon in?
Order:
Episode I – The Phantom Menace
Episode II – Attack of the Clones
Episode IV – A New Hope
Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back
Episode III – Revenge of the Sith
Episode VI – Return of the Jedi

What I like about this order:
I see it as being that the Original Episodes (IV-VI) is the present and we start of looking at a flash back. Then we return to the present day where we start to see Luke grow up and learn the ways of the Jedi. We stay with series for two more episodes before returning back for one last flashback in Episode III. Here we would learn how Anakin turns to the Dark Side. We then finish out the series how it should be with Episode VI, with ties up loose ends. Reveals more about the relationships of Luke, Anakin, and Leia. And we get the happy ending, unlike if you watched it in the order it was released.

Sorry if i may have confused some things here, I haven’t seen several of these in quite some time and have always wanted to watch them in a row.

So let me know what you think. Thanks.

---

If this were to be the first time you ever watched the movies I would be screaming at you NOT to watch them that way … but since you have the order doesn’t really matter after you’ve first seen them.

The order you suggest … wouldn’t work for me … don’t know why probably something about not being able to teach a old dog new tricks.

May The Force Be With You …

Jedi Dude 28 | Jul 21, 2009

---

What ever floats your boat. I personally like to go IV-V-VI-I-II-III, because you can catch the little comments like Obi Wan saying "Your going to be the death of me" from II, and such, that make you think. I and II are worthless, except for about 10 minutes.
Electric Company | Jul 21, 2009

---

actually I would go in order 1-6 but, as long as you get to enjoy them all then have at it!
Darth Mike 420 | Jul 21, 2009

---

I thinks that’s idiotic.
1 2 4 5 I might forgive you for, but 5 3 6 is just stupid.
4 5 6 1 2 3 is the only way to go…
martinthurn | Jul 21, 2009

---

I like watching them in Star Wars chronological order which is 1-6 rather than Earth chronological which is 4-6 then 1-3. I like your reasoning though.
Gothic Goddess | Jul 21, 2009

---

you need to watch it in this order:
episode 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3
george R | Jul 22, 2009

---

We showed our kids these movies 4,5,6, 1,2, 3, and then again about a year later 1- 6. They prefer the latter order now (1-6) as they get confused with the jumps back and forth in time. (At least, that is what they SAY, though they are Doctor Who nuts so I can’t quite believe that excuse).
Anyway, I’m glad they watched 4, 5, 6 first due to that bombshell of all time not being spoiled by watching them in "chronological" order.
But since you’ve already seen them all, it doesn’t really matter.
The main thing is – ENJOY!
Vicki W | Jul 22, 2009

---

Eh.
Vava | Jul 23, 2009

---

i just go in the order they came out 456 123 because there are jokes and comments. going back and forth could get confusing.
or just go 123456 to watch the story in it’s entirty.
if someone’s there who hasn’t seen them you should deffinately go in the original order of 456 123.
J. R. | Jul 24, 2009

Asylum (2005) IMDB rating: 6.00 Plot: A psychiatrist’s wife encounters one of her husband’s charges, an inmate at a maximum security asylum in the outskirts of London. Her curious attraction to this man, who was found guilty in the murder and disfigurement of his former wife, grows stronger as he’s placed on the job to restore the asylum’s conservatory, mere steps from her home.

find here and download Asylum for my PDA

Actors: Bonneville Hugh,Lewis Gus,McKellen Ian,Ackland Joss,Csokas Marton,Willox Robert,Harris Sean,Romance,Thriller,

Can you proof read this? Descriptive essay?
As my I regain my consciousness from my nightly slumber,

Cat People (1982) IMDB rating: 5.80 Plot: In this erotic remake of the 1942 classic, a young woman’s sexual awakening brings horror when she discovers her urges transform her into a monstrous black leopard.

download Cat People

Actors: McDowell Malcolm,Heard John,Begley Jr. Ed,Paulin Scott,Faison Frankie,Diamond Ron,Larroquette John,Barajas Fausto,Drama,Fantasy,Horror,Romance,Thriller,

I would lyk 2 d MBA in B – school in chennai but i havent crack CAT r XAT?
pls suggest b-schools n is it gud takin MBA in IT & operations….????

Cold Mountain (2003) IMDB rating: 7.30 Plot: Jude Law plays a leading role as Inman, a wounded confederate soldier who is on a perilous journey home to his mountain community, hoping to reunite with his prewar sweetheart, Ada, played by Nicole Kidman.

Actors: Suplee Ethan,Law Jude,Gammon James,Winstone Ray,Gleeson Brendan,Sutherland Donald,Hoffman Philip Seymour,Ribisi Giovanni,White Jack,Hunnam Charlie,Drama,Romance,War,

My ideal girl (whats yours?) girls feel free to give opinions.?
In a perfect world were you could shop for an ideal GF this is how she would look like :

She would be smart , yet not put me or anyone else down when she knows someone is wrong , also she would know to admit that she was wrong and she would listen before passing judgment.

My ideal girl would like to be outdoors , doing some sort of sport or just mountain hiking , would not be afraid to do spontaneous things like leaving for another state on a one day notice.

She would not be prude and would be willing to experiment anything in bed or anyware were we feel the urge ! like the back of a car or a theater ! yet she would not be flirty with other man other than to get us a discount or out of ticket etc .. you see the picture…

She would live in the moment and don’t worry too much what tomorrow would bring , to a degree.

She would be in good shape , with a great butt , (chest not important) and willing to try any sports ! also she would not mind sweating , hot , or cold weather .

She would have a positive attitude and would know how to lead but also follow , she would not panic , specially with non important things (like burning dinner or the faucet broken and the water is running out )

She would play video games occasionally and would want to watch movies and listen to all kinds of music .

she would be optimistic ! finding the light in the darkest places !

She would enjoy sex and crave me at all moments .

She would turn guys away that come talk to her with flirtatious intentions .

She would like to go out to parties or clubs , but not every day or week.

She would play tennis and kick my butt (this one is a winner)

She would be athletic ! able to run , swim , etc… and would care about her health and maintain a health weight !

She would only shop out of necessity and not for hours every week .

she would be honest but would care about my feelings when saying stuff in a touch full way.

She would sing or play the piano or some musical instrument!

If I ever find this girl or something that comes close , I would be willing to try to be her perfect guy as well , I know not all of this is possible , but the more items in the list would be awesome .

Now lets hear it from you !

---

I gotta say this but this is scary as you described nearly everything about me, but except all the really sexual things as I’m way too young for that!!
But seriously, I love sports, dont mind playing video games, extremly happi always and i play piano, sing and guitar and I preety much match everything else!!
stop reading my mind
Lara | Feb 03, 2010

---

My wonderful lady is pretty much all of that and much more!

Gorgeous!

Highly intelligent yet down to earth.

We fit together perfectly, in all ways.

She is less than half my age.
Starman | Feb 03, 2010

Wimbledon (2004) IMDB rating: 6.40 Plot: In just two summer weeks, a British tennis player who was ranked 119th in the world (Bettany), and generally considered to be on his last legs as a professional player, gets his one last chance to win both the All-England Lawn Tennis Championships on the grassy courts of Wimbledon… and the heart of the rising star “bad girl of tennis” (Dunst) as well…

download Wimbledon

Actors: Bettany Paul,Hyde Kyle,Robert Lindsay,McAvoy James,Hill Bernard,Jackson Barry,Coster-Waldau Nikolaj,Neill Sam,Drama,Comedy,Romance,Sport,

Who is better? Roger Federer or Nadal?
To me it’s clearly Nadal. I mean he beat Roger at virtually every big tournament in 2008 in the finals. First at the French, which was like a joke for Nadal. Then he beat him at Wimbledon on grass in a close final. And then he also beat him at the Australian Open in the final in 2009. After that he fell victim to injury, so Federer started winning Grand Slams again and all these people start going out and saying how great he is. If he’s so great, then why does he always lose to Nadal? Doesn’t that make Nadal better?

---

Federer as beaten Sampras in 2001 when his career was almost over. But Gilles Simon is 2-0 vs Federer. Therefore Gilles Simon is a greater player than Pete Sampras.

Hope this help you figure out Nadal fan logic isn’t much of a logic.
Joelouis | Feb 03, 2010

---

The history books measure who’s the greater player by who’s got the more trophies and accolades. I mean just because someone has a good record against someone else doesn’t mean they are better than them at tennis in general. Clay is Rafa’s turf so it’s natural for him to beat Federer, and to beat him so many times. I don’t really remember, but wasn’t it something like 5 out of the 7 times they played (and Nadal beat him) was on clay? Yes, he beat Federer elsewhere too, but I really do think it was because Federer mentally slipped (as do many players in finals. After all, he is human.) Comparing all the people who have beaten Federer to all the people who have beaten Nadal, shows that when Federer loses he often loses to the same people, whereas Nadal’s game can be beaten by a variety of players at times, so Federer’s game is more consistent. When he is at his peak Federer can beat anyone anywhere anytime, which is how he keeps winning, whereas Nadal isn’t as consistent. In that game against Murray in the AO he couldn’t really match what Murray was throwing at him. You could blame it on the knee, but Murray, who was really peaking, played really well even in the first set and probably wouldn’t have had trouble beating Nadal even if he was in fine form. So IMHO I do think Federer is the better player, simply beccause he has a better game and has the trophies to prove it.
Just Call Me Silver | Feb 03, 2010

---

for me there is no question about the fact that federer is much better…. after all he is the best that existed in the comtemporary times.. nadal just came into the picture sometime back and it almost gone ….. a player is judged by his consistency …. and when he was beat by nadal in the year 2008 many times it was because he was suffering from mono and nadal was at his peak …. but still made it to the finals of two slams and even managed to win one … nadal’s game revolves around running about the court and playing defence so obviously he will get more frequently injured… federer is more fit .. he plays on and still hasent suffered a major injury .. that makes him the better player by any means … nadal shouldnt even be compared roger.. roger is a class apart… (according to me ).. and if nadal fell victim to injury it means there is something which he is doing wrong .. cause roger has stayed out of big injuries..
Doogie | Feb 03, 2010

---

if head to head is the only basis who is better player,then nadal easily reach all grandslam and win it.because federer does…
nadal has the mental edge over federer,but not the better player.
vic | Feb 03, 2010

---

Just Call Me Silver, yes that was what you are silver, 2nd place now move over, because you have got to be out of your damn mind if you really think Andy Murray can take on a healthy, 100% Nadal.
Spades and Diamonds | Feb 03, 2010

---

Nadal is a better player!… for you… but for me, definitely federer! Nadal may have a 13-7 advantage against federer but federer’s career is far from over! Federer can still rebound, but sadly Nadal wasn’t always there to make it to the finals. Now that Nadal is ranked no.4 he doesn’t need to be in the finals to face Federer, they’ll be facing each other in the quarters, then we’ll see if Federer can amend his losses.

*Davydenko, Hewitt, Blake, Nalbandian, to name just a few, has a winning record against Nadal. So would they be considered a better player than Nadal?
cleng-cleng | Feb 03, 2010

---

I personally hate federer and love nadal but i have to admit that federer is better .
Gregi | Feb 03, 2010

---

do you know what happens if you embed a formula 1 engine in a normal car? it works fine for some time.

can you see the parallel to Roger and Rafa? Rafa did and Roger didn’t!
the question remains, is it worth it to stand for some time in the spotlight?
nevie82 | Feb 03, 2010

---

Sorry to burst your bubble a little there. The problem with your reasoning is that you are looking only at a head to head comparison to make your decision. Unfortunately for your logic, there’s more to determining what constitutes a great player than the head to head numbers.

There are a handful of people that have winning records over Federer and I’m sure plenty of people that have winning records over Nadal. The measure of greatness in tennis is consistent results over a career. Federer has made some rediculous amount of semi finals along with appearing in 18 of the last 19 grand slam finals or something like that. He has won 16 grand slams over an extremely short period of time in tennis terms and has done all that while staying healthy! So why is he better than Nadal?

1. He has an incredibly long streak of making the semi finals or better at the grand slams.
2. He has won more grand slams than any other male player
3. He knows how to win AND stay healthy. Nadal had his moment in the limelight but he is sacrificing a long career by insisting on working so incredibly hard to win his matches. There’s more offensive ways to play and safer ways to move.

It takes more than head to head scores to make someone a better player my friend. While Nadal is rehabbing his knees because he has destroyed them, Federer is continuing to win as if Nadal was never there.
whtennisfan115 | Feb 03, 2010

---

Nedal
Riley | Feb 03, 2010

---

in 2008 and begining of 2009, federer was suffered from mono virus. Nadal was able to barely beat federer by epic match because federer was sick. have you ever seen nadal beaten healthy federer before 2008 in those tournaments? nope, healthy federer always beat healthy nadal all the times. who won the last match they met at madrid open when they are both healthy? federer. so No one can beat federer in his prime time.
killy gonso | Feb 03, 2010

---

The very simplistic answer is that Roger is better overall on more surfaces and has done it more consistently over a longer period of time, now this is depending on whether you take into consideration the last 12 months where Fed has won 3 of the last 4 majors. Howerver, Nadal has beaten Federer more often than not, but this is mostly because Nadal is the only player that can exploit Fed’s weakness. With the kicking lefty slice serve coupled with the big top-spin forehand, Nadal can get to Fed’s maybe only kryptonite, the high-backhand return. Roger doesn’t have a problem with his game overall (see 2008) when he loses to Nadal, he just has a problem with Rafa. That’s why he was so frustrated with Rafa beat him at FO 08, Wimb 08, and AO 09 (w/ tears). Roger can be error prone on the backhand and when he hits too many of those weak slice returns…Roger just gets frustrated, tries to press, and doesn’t win. I will say however, that on Roger’s best day against Nadal’s best day on any surface except clay, Roger would win because he plays superior offensive tennis.
Thomas | Feb 03, 2010

---

federer
leveykid95 | Feb 03, 2010

---

Head to head record does not determine who is better. Nadal has a game style that does not match up well for Federer. And most of those matches are on clay courts where Nadal is one of the greatest ever (and for the record, if there was no Nadal, I think Federer might be considered the best clay courter ever). So, maybe Federer loses to Nadal on occasion, but Federer doesn’t often lose to anyone else, especially in the majors, which seems to be all Federer focuses on now. Federer has been able to make it to 23 consecutive grand slam semifinals, Nadal has never gotten more than 5 in a row. So it might be true that head to head Nadal will beat Federer, but Federer has been able to be at the end of the tournament every time. For a couple of years, 2004-2007, if you were not named Rafael Nadal, you almost had no chance against Federer. Federer dominated the game for 4 years like no one ever had or ever will again. He had a 313-24 record for those 4 years. That is a 92.87 winning percentage for a 4 year period, that is absolutely unheard of. And his grand slam record for that period was 99-5, that is a 95.19 winning percentage. It is simply that Nadal is great and can beat Federer, but he might lose early in a tournament no one expects him too, Federer (at least for a while) would not lose a match that he shouldn’t.
Sam M | Feb 03, 2010

---

clearly, its nadal..fed has been winning most of his grandslams beating one dimensional morons like roddick, ferrero, hewitt, bagdatis, etc..if he is better than nadal, then should have won 5 times in Roland Garros and never gave Nadal a chance to whip his ass in Grandslams..

To sum it all, Federer wins Grandslams more than he deserves..
Troy SPhinx | Feb 04, 2010

---

You said it! NADAL IS!!!
Acey | Feb 04, 2010

---

u idiot how stupid r u thank god not all rafa fans r as stupid as u. ROGER FEDERER IS THE GREATEST TENNIS PLAYER IN HISTORY do you no who said that RAFA and im a massive rafa fan no your shit u fool if tennis was based on head to head ud find that mark philipousus is better than pete sampras get a life dopey
Chad | Feb 05, 2010

I Hate Valentine’s Day (2009) IMDB rating: 5.20 Plot: A love story set in Manhattan, where a florist who abides by a strict five-date-limit with any man finds herself wanting more with the new restaurateur in town.

Actors: Corbett John,Guarino Stephen,Arison Amir,Wilmes Gary,Starr Mike,Mantzoukas Jason,Friedlander Judah,Sanders Jay O.,Olive,Finnerty Dan,Comedy,Romance,

First Valentines for Husband?
I would like to get something for my husband for Valentines Day. I’m sure he doesn’t expect anything, under our circumstances, our little girl is a great gift…
The problem is, I’m due to have our little girl any day now, we have 3 other children Living in the household, so I stay busy. I do not have time to make a card or fix anything up for him.
We do not have much extra money, what money we do have, we usually eat out together or something, it’s kind of our little thing.
I would love to rub him or something, but he hasn’t let me rub him in a while, he doesn’t even like me washing clothes or anything. (The Obgyn said not to lift anything heavy, and to take it easy, he’s really protective)
What is something, special, that I could do for him? We do not have any pictures, we have them on our camera, but none printed out yet. I’ve been thinking about making a slide show with our kids, and us, and putting it on a cd. (He hates computers though) If I made a slide show, would it work in a dvd player?
I don’t have powerpoint or anything on this computer, What is a way I could make a cd slide show without downloading it? -This is my mothers computer, so I would rather not download a bunch of stuff.
Or, what are some ideas, please?

---

If you make a slideshow, email it to me eddie has a ton of blank cd’s and dvd’s and we can burn it to one, and give to u- and you can play in ur dvd player.. love ya
Renee | Feb 05, 2010

---

If you’re looking for a unique and meaningful gift idea for your husband, these personalized soapcards from soapcard.com might do the trick. They make heart shaped soaps with your photo or message embedded inside. I got one for my boyfriend and he loved it. You can write all kinds of funny stuff…. My boyfriend thought it was super cute! .the "Think of me when you’re feeling dirty" soap was the one he loved the most…
Love of my life | Feb 05, 2010

---

Make a bunch of origami hearts (ehow) and folded roses (bloom4ever) and fill a ‘love jar’ with a love note

Laminate a photo of the two of you or of the whole family, made into a bookmark – so it can be a few small pics or just one, glue it to construction paper with hearts, then hole punch the top and put a piece of twine though the hole and tie a knot in it.

Handmade ‘love’ coupons to be used after your postpartum dr visit

His favorite Meal
Movie night – his choice
one free back massage
one free hug
one free kiss
one free ________ (x-rated)
one free restaurant pick
one free batch of cookies
one free batch of brownies
one free day to spend doing something he likes
one day to sleep in with breakfast in bed
Larkin L | Feb 05, 2010